On October 6, 1866 King Ludwig II of Bavaria founded the Feldzugs-Denkzeichen für 1849 (Campaign Memento for 1849) or Campaign Cross for 1849 “for the Bavarian troops that went into the field against Denmark in 1849” according to the Statutes of October 7, 1866 [Verodnungsblatt (Official-Gazette) 1866, Nr. 61].  The troops who took part were 4 Infantry Battalions of the 1st Brigade, the 1st Chevauleger-Regiment, and two artillery batteries.

The cross (with a long ribbon) could be tied to the top of the flags and standards of the authorized detachments and thus carried.  Individual Officers and soldiers who met the requirements to be awarded the cross could wear it on their left breast suspended by the ribbon.

Prior to this date, King Ludwig II of Bavaria had founded the Armeedenkzeichen für 1866 (Army Memento for 1866) or Army Cross for 1866 on August 25, 1866.



Figure 1: Obverse of the Bavarian Campaign Cross for 1849. Image from the author’s archive.



Figure 2: Reverse of the Bavarian Campaign Cross for 1849. Image from the author’s archive.



The bronze cross is dark colored (patinaed) , and the raised edges of the curved cross arms and the numbers of the year stand out in bright bronze.  In the obverse center of the cross is a left-facing rampant crowned Bavarian Lion on a lozenge-field surrounded by a wreath of oak leaves bound at the top and bottom. In the reverse center of the cross is the year date “1849” surrounded by a wreath of oak leaves bound at the top and bottom.  The cross is 36 mm high and 36 mm wide.  The cross weighs approximately 16.5 grams.  The poppy-red ribbon is 35 mm wide with a bright-green 2mm-wide stripe at each edge. This is the identical ribbon as was used for the Bavarian Memento for the year 1849 (Denkzeichen für das Jahre 1849), Bronze Medal founded on June 10, 1849.

Regarding the material that the cross is made of, it is simply described as “metal” in the statutes.  There is no mention of the cross being made from bronze from captured enemy cannon (as was the case with many Prussian campaign awards).  There is also no mention regarding if the crosses were die-struck or were cast.



Figure 3: Edge detail of the Bavarian Campaign Cross for 1849. Image from the author’s archive.



Upon close examination of the cross, there are no casting flaws of any kind observed, thus supporting the possibility that the crosses were die-struck.  However, there is evidence of grinding around the edges of the center and around the edges of the cross arms which would support the possibility that these pieces were cast.  In addition, the centers of these pieces are in high-relief compared to the arms of the cross.  It would therefore be much more difficult to die-strike a cross like this as opposed to a round medal with a flat planchet.  A die would therefore be under significant strain from differential force at the center and at the edges.  It would also be difficult to get the metal to flow into this shape during such a die-strike.  There is also a suspension lug at the top of the cross which does not readily show signs of having been joined onto the cross body, thus possibly supporting the casting theory.  I have yet to locate literary evidence to support either hypothesis.

Once the crosses were formed and their edges ground, they were then chemically darkened.  Various sources use the words: getönt (toned), gebeizte (pickled), and grundirt (primed) to describe the darkening process.  In any case the bronze was oxidized to add a dark patina.  After the crosses were darkened, the obverse and reverse raised cross arm edges were polished, as were the raised numbers of the “1849” date on the reverse.

There are also unofficial “Prinzen” or “Reduktion” crosses that exist.  The cross shown below is a 24 mm high and 24 mm wide example.  In addition, miniatures of various sizes can also be found.



Figure 4: The obverse of a reduced-size cross shown on the right. Image from the author’s archive.



Figure 5: The reverse of a reduced-size cross shown on the right. Image from the author’s archive.



Thank you for your interest regarding this article. Comments are welcome.

– Lorin




Hessenthal, Waldemar Hesse Edlen von und Schreiber, Georg. Die tragbaren Ehrenzeichen des Deutschen Reiches. Verlag Uniformen-Markt Otto Dietrich. Berlin, 1940.

Heyden, Hermann von. Ehren-Zeichen (Kriegs-Denkzeichen, Verdienst- und Dienstalters-Zeichen) der erloschenen und blühen- den Staaten Deutschlands und Österreich-Ungarns. Kommissions-Verlag von Brückner & Renner, Herzogl. Hofbuchhandlung. Meiningen, 1897.

Schreiber, Georg. Die Bayerischen Orden und Ehrenzeichen. Prestel-Verlag. München, 1964.

Verordnungs-Blatt des Königlich Bayerischen Kriegsministeriums, 1866, No. 1 mit 67.  Druck der F. S. Hübschmann’schen Buchdruckerie (E. Lintner), München, 1866.



© 2020. All Rights Reserved.  The content displayed in this article (including all photographs) is the intellectual property of the author.  You may not reuse, republish, or reprint such content without the written consent of the author.

Please follow and like us:
  1. Servus Lorin,

    Again a very interesting article about the “Feldzugsdenkzeichen” of 1849. The exact number of crosses produced is not officially known. However, a newspaper article from 1866 provides information that 75,000 of the 1866 army memorial and only 5,000 of the 1849 military memorial were made. The design for the crosses was made by the jeweler Quellhorst. I think that this newspaper article still fits as a supplement to the excellently researched article.

    Many greetings from Bavaria

    • Servus Walter,

      Thank you for your message and for the outstanding information contained in
      the newspaper article regarding the total number of awards. What are your
      opinions regarding how these crosses were made, and what they were made of?
      Were they cast in your opinion? Were they possibly made from bronze smelted from captured enemy canon?

      With friendly greetings from the USA to Bavaria,


  2. Servus Lorin,

    The information provided by the regulations only specifies metal. Bronze can be recognized from some of the crosses polished by the wearer or later collector. If this was obtained from captured cannons, it would certainly have been mentioned. So, I think that bronze was used but not cannon bronze from captured cannons. In terms of quality, the crosses were probably cast and later reworked.

    Many greetings from Bavaria to the USA

  3. I found this medal in my late fathers belonging, are they rare to have or is it common? My father was a collector of many things and really don’t know much about this item just did a quick look up and your interesting article came up and matched my item. I would appreciate any feedback . Merry Christmas from America.

    • Hello Cammie,

      Thank you for your inquiry regarding this award.
      Yes, this cross is relatively scarce with only 5,000 awarded in 1866.
      Undoubtedly, not many of these have survived.
      Some of these items are found in the US from German immigrants
      bringing their possessions with them to the US,
      or from US soldiers who bought back these items when returning from overseas duty.
      Would it be possible to provide photos (front and back) of the item from your late Father’s collection?

      A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from New York,


Leave a Reply to Walter Kinast Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.